Skip to content

[pull] master from git:master#83

Merged
pull[bot] merged 8 commits intoturkdevops:masterfrom
git:master
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

[pull] master from git:master#83
pull[bot] merged 8 commits intoturkdevops:masterfrom
git:master

Conversation

@pull
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pull pull bot commented Jul 29, 2025

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.3)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

ayu-ch and others added 8 commits July 16, 2025 08:25
…auto"

When core.commentChar is set to "auto", Git selects a comment character
by scanning the commit message contents and avoiding any character
already present in the message.

If the message still contains old conflict comments (starting with a
comment character), Git assumes that character is in use and chooses a
different one. As a result, those existing comment lines are no longer
recognized as comments and end up being included in the final commit
message.

To avoid this, skip scanning the trailing comment block when selecting
the comment character. This allows Git to safely reuse the original
character when appropriate, keeping the commit message clean and free of
leftover conflict information.

Background:

The "auto" value for core.commentchar was introduced in the commit
84c9dc2 (commit: allow core.commentChar=auto for character auto
selection, 2014-05-17) but did not exhibit this issue at that time.

The bug was introduced in commit a6c2654 (rebase -m: fix --signoff
with conflicts, 2024-04-18) where Git started writing conflict comments
to the file at 'rebase_path_message()'.

Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If conflict comments already use a comment character that isn't "#", and
core.commentChar is set "auto", Git will ignore these lines during the
scan using ignored_log_message_bytes() and pick a new comment character
based on the rest of the message. The newly chosen character may be
different from the one used in the conflict comments and therefore,
these are no longer treated as comments and end up in the final commit
message.

For example, during a rebase if the user previously set
core.commentChar=% and then encounters a conflict, conflict comments
like "% Conflicts:" are generated. If the user subsequently sets
core.commentChar=auto before running `rebase --continue`, Git parses the
"auto" setting and begins scanning. It first uses the existing
'comment_line_str' (which is '%') to detect and ignore conflict comments
via ignored_log_message_bytes().

Then, Git scans the rest of the message (excluding conflict comments),
sees that none of the remaining lines start with '#' and decides to set
comment_line_str to '#'. Since the final commit character differs from
the one used in the conflict comments, those lines are no longer
considered comments and get included in the final commit message.

Set 'comment_line_str' to '#' when core.commentChar is set to 'auto' to
reset any previously set value.

While this does not solve the issue of conflict comment inclusion and
the user visible behaviour stays tha same, it standardizes the behaviour
of the code by always resetting 'comment_line_str' to '#' when
core.commentChar=auto is parsed.

The patch text is based on Phillip Wood's message:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/9e96aaab-79a2-4632-94cd-d016d4a63b30@gmail.com/
and the commit log message is wriiten by me.

Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pop_most_recent_commit() calls commit_list_insert_by_date() for parent
commits, which is itself called in a loop.  This can lead to quadratic
complexity if there are many merges.  Replace the commit_list with a
prio_queue to ensure logarithmic worst case complexity and convert all
three users.

Add a performance test that exercises one of them using a pathological
history that consists of 50% merges and 50% root commits to demonstrate
the speedup:

Test                          v2.50.1           HEAD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1501.2: rev-parse ':/65535'   2.48(2.47+0.00)   0.20(0.19+0.00) -91.9%

Alas, sane histories don't benefit from the conversion much, and
traversing Git's own history takes a 1% performance hit on my machine:

   $ hyperfine -w3 -L git ./git_2.50.1,./git '{git} rev-parse :/^Initial.revision'
   Benchmark 1: ./git_2.50.1 rev-parse :/^Initial.revision
     Time (mean ± σ):      1.071 s ±  0.004 s    [User: 1.052 s, System: 0.017 s]
     Range (min … max):    1.067 s …  1.078 s    10 runs

   Benchmark 2: ./git rev-parse :/^Initial.revision
     Time (mean ± σ):      1.079 s ±  0.003 s    [User: 1.060 s, System: 0.017 s]
     Range (min … max):    1.074 s …  1.083 s    10 runs

   Summary
     ./git_2.50.1 rev-parse :/^Initial.revision ran
       1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than ./git rev-parse :/^Initial.revision

Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a function to replace the top element of the queue that basically
does the same as prio_queue_get() followed by prio_queue_put(), but
without the work by prio_queue_get() to rebalance the heap.  It can be
used to optimize loops that get one element and then immediately add
another one.  That's common e.g., with commit history traversal, where
we get out a commit and then put in its parents.

Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Optimize pop_most_recent_commit() by adding the first parent using the
more efficient prio_queue_peek() and prio_queue_replace() instead of
prio_queue_get() and prio_queue_put().

On my machine this neutralizes the performance hit it took in Git's own
repository when we converted it to prio_queue two patches ago (git_pq):

   $ hyperfine -w3 -L git ./git_2.50.1,./git_pq,./git '{git} rev-parse :/^Initial.revision'
   Benchmark 1: ./git_2.50.1 rev-parse :/^Initial.revision
     Time (mean ± σ):      1.073 s ±  0.003 s    [User: 1.053 s, System: 0.019 s]
     Range (min … max):    1.069 s …  1.078 s    10 runs

   Benchmark 2: ./git_pq rev-parse :/^Initial.revision
     Time (mean ± σ):      1.077 s ±  0.002 s    [User: 1.057 s, System: 0.018 s]
     Range (min … max):    1.072 s …  1.079 s    10 runs

   Benchmark 3: ./git rev-parse :/^Initial.revision
     Time (mean ± σ):      1.069 s ±  0.003 s    [User: 1.049 s, System: 0.018 s]
     Range (min … max):    1.065 s …  1.074 s    10 runs

   Summary
     ./git rev-parse :/^Initial.revision ran
       1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than ./git_2.50.1 rev-parse :/^Initial.revision
       1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than ./git_pq rev-parse :/^Initial.revision

Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The pop_most_recent_commit() function can have quite expensive
worst case performance characteristics, which has been optimized by
using prio-queue data structure.

* rs/pop-recent-commit-with-prio-queue:
  commit: use prio_queue_replace() in pop_most_recent_commit()
  prio-queue: add prio_queue_replace()
  commit: convert pop_most_recent_commit() to prio_queue
"git commit" that concludes a conflicted merge failed to notice and remove
existing comment added automatically (like "# Conflicts:") when the
core.commentstring is set to 'auto'.

* ac/auto-comment-char-fix:
  config: set comment_line_str to "#" when core.commentChar=auto
  commit: avoid scanning trailing comments when 'core.commentChar' is "auto"
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 29, 2025
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Jul 29, 2025
@pull pull bot merged commit e813a02 into turkdevops:master Jul 29, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants